Burning Bright

  • Title: Burning Bright
  • Author: John Steinbeck John Ditsky
  • ISBN: 9780143039440
  • Page: 342
  • Format: Paperback
  • Burning Bright Written as a play in story form this novel traces the story of a man ignorant of his own sterility a wife who commits adultery to give her husband a child the father of that child and the outsider
    Written as a play in story form, this novel traces the story of a man ignorant of his own sterility, a wife who commits adultery to give her husband a child, the father of that child, and the outsider whose actions affect them all.

    • [PDF] Ñ Free Download Ý Burning Bright : by John Steinbeck John Ditsky ↠
      342 John Steinbeck John Ditsky
    • thumbnail Title: [PDF] Ñ Free Download Ý Burning Bright : by John Steinbeck John Ditsky ↠
      Posted by:John Steinbeck John Ditsky
      Published :2019-06-10T15:53:59+00:00

    About John Steinbeck John Ditsky


    1. John Steinbeck III was an American writer He wrote the Pulitzer Prize winning novel The Grapes of Wrath, published in 1939 and the novella Of Mice and Men, published in 1937 In all, he wrote twenty five books, including sixteen novels, six non fiction books and several collections of short stories In 1962 Steinbeck received the Nobel Prize for Literature.Steinbeck grew up in the Salinas Valley region of California, a culturally diverse place of rich migratory and immigrant history This upbringing imparted a regionalistic flavor to his writing, giving many of his works a distinct sense of place Steinbeck moved briefly to New York City, but soon returned home to California to begin his career as a writer Most of his earlier work dealt with subjects familiar to him from his formative years An exception was his first novel Cup of Gold which concerns the pirate Henry Morgan, whose adventures had captured Steinbeck s imagination as a child.In his subsequent novels, Steinbeck found a authentic voice by drawing upon direct memories of his life in California Later he used real historical conditions and events in the first half of 20th century America, which he had experienced first hand as a reporter Steinbeck often populated his stories with struggling characters his works examined the lives of the working class and migrant workers during the Dust Bowl and the Great Depression His later body of work reflected his wide range of interests, including marine biology, politics, religion, history, and mythology One of his last published works was Travels with Charley, a travelogue of a road trip he took in 1960 to rediscover America He died in 1968 in New York of a heart attack and his ashes are interred in Salinas.Seventeen of his works, including The Grapes of Wrath 1940 , Cannery Row 1945 , The Pearl 1947 , and East of Eden 1952 , went on to become Hollywood films, and Steinbeck also achieved success as a Hollywood writer, receiving an Academy Award nomination for Best Story in 1944 for Alfred Hitchcock s Lifeboat.


    254 Comments


    1. 3.5 Stars I have a fondness for Steinbeck, and so it is with great regret that I have to criticize this novella. My edition comes in at a whopping 93 pages, and I really think that about a quarter of that should've found its way to the cutting room floor. There are better ways to convey concepts and ideas than repetition. There are better ways of showing emotion than overwrought dialogue. Perhaps if this had been written in more of a standard play format, it wouldn't have felt that way but worki [...]

      Reply

    2. Nesta coisa híbrida a que Steinbeck dá o nome de romance-peça, os personagens interagem entre si em cenários cambiantes, cada acto é único nesse aspecto, mas as suas motivações permanecem constantes e a acção é perfeitamente linear. Da minha curta experiência, o diálogo de Steinbeck, que ganha ainda mais relevo numa obra como esta, é só equiparável ao de Hemingway.

      Reply

    3. Burning Bright was my first ever Steinbeck piece (I know, I know, WHY HAVEN'T I READ OF MICE AND MEN YET?) so I wasn't quite sure what to expect. As as theatre studies undergrad, I was interested about the play-novelette structure of the piece, but other than that, I really didn't have any expectations towards this one. And I am kind of happy that I didn't, because I was allowed to be surprised about how much I actually find myself enjoying this one.Burning Bright is one of the books I will prob [...]

      Reply

    4. «با وجود تمام ترس‌ها و خطاهایمان باز هم در وجودمان نوری میدرخشد و این مهمترین چیز است: در درونمان آتشی فروزان است.»«ترجمه‌ی مرضیه خسروی»

      Reply

    5. Човек никога не може да сбърка със Стайнбек, по мое мнение.Дори в рамките на стотина страници, човекът успява да сътвори чудеса.Единственият проблем с книжката (както и със "За мишките и хората") е, че ти се иска да беше писал още, още, още.

      Reply

    6. A "play novelette" about the Balinese cure for male sterility as Elizabeth Gilbert describes it in Eat Pray Love. The dialogue is a little hokey, and sometimes the melodrama is hard to take seriously, but it's still a smart and effective story. I've always liked that vein of American fiction that delivers their sexually charged themes through a framework of insinuation and tension, like Tennessee Williams and old Hollywood. This is among them, although it's maybe a bit more explicit. The coolest [...]

      Reply

    7. It boggles that I'd give any Steinbeck work a three-star rating, since I think he's one of the hallowed masters, but this little curio of a book didn't move me. It's such an odd work—he dubbed it a "play-novelette"—set in three acts, with the stage trappings of place and character declaration drawn in, to me, stiff caricature. The speech of the players often has a blustery formality that kept me at a distance, though some passages have the rich Steinbeck hand. Perhaps if I hadn't read a good [...]

      Reply

    8. The play novellette is what Steinbeck talking about, but the real thing is that he could't write a play. What he discussed in the foreword didn't convinced me at all. It's a novellette where all events happened in one place every chapter, or a play with a lot of description.I liked "of mice and men", didn't read "the moon is down", but "burning bright" was a complete disaster, the story is very silly and stupid, the chracters are shallow and unconvincing, the only remarkabe thing is that changin [...]

      Reply

    9. May we all have a friend like Friend Ed.

      Reply

    10. My husband and I had met each other only a few weeks before I read this unforgettable little novel. He could not believe that a book could make anybody cry so much!

      Reply

    11. "Chama Devoradora" é um livro original na forma como conta a história que Joe Saul, Mordeen, Vítor e Amigo Ed partilham. Estes são os nomes que Steinbeck decidiu dar às suas personagens, mas poderiam ter sido outros porque o que eles representam é a espécie humana, as nossas preocupações, os nossos anseios, os nossos desejos e objectivos. As realidades de onde vimos até podem ser diferentes, mas na essência somos de facto muito semelhantes, programados para preservar a espécie, embor [...]

      Reply

    12. “Ярко сияние” на Стайнбек е нещо малко и красиво: knigolandiafo/2009/11/b Не очаквах това книжле да ми хареса. Купих го, защото обожавам Стайнбек, особено потресаващите “Грозодовете на гнева” и “Тортила Флет”.И все пак останах потресен след изчитане на стотината странички. Големия [...]

      Reply

    13. My least favorite Steinbeck novel, but I'm glad I gave it a second chance. I still think it's a failure, and by far the least satisfying of his play-novelette experiments, but there are still moments of classic Steinbeck brilliance, in the characters and the descriptions, if not in the story.

      Reply

    14. Bir Gazap Üzümleri değil ama John Steinbeck ne yazdıysa okunur.

      Reply

    15. Gracias a la explicación ofrecida en el prólogo, supe que ésta es en realidad una obra de teatro, escrita de manera que sea accesible para quienes no suelen leer libretos de teatro; de otra manera no me habría enterado, pues la narrativa fluye sin tropiezos. Imagino que, para ser una obra de teatro publicada en 1950, debió haber sido bastante experimental, pues en el primer acto los personajes son trapecistas de circo, y en el segundo acto son granjeros, y terminan siendo marineros en el ac [...]

      Reply

    16. A bit soap-opera-ey, but elevated by Steinbeck's strong voice. Here he was experimenting with what he called the "play-novelette" with the book consisting of three acts, with four scenes altogether, each scene contained to one setting. Dialogue-heavy, Steinbeck said, "It is a play that is easy to read or a short novel that can be played simply by lifting out the dialogue."But I was most excited and intrigued by the way he experimented with his settings, a trick which I will not give away here - [...]

      Reply

    17. Zanimljiv koncept i svakako zanimljiva moralna premisa, ali je izvedba neizbrusena i osrednja unatoc lijepom stilu

      Reply

    18. I finally read a Steinbeck book that I didn't love.

      Reply

    19. This is an interesting novel, that is more like a play but takes readers behind the scenes of adultery, marital discontent and more.

      Reply

    20. the third and final of steinbeck's "play-novelettes" (after of mice and men and the moon is down), burning bright is a brief, yet remarkably powerful exploration of pride and paternity. steinbeck considered the work an experiment, "a combination of many old forms." in the foreword he outlines his reasons for attempting this synthesis, well aware of the format's inherent obstacles: "the difficulties of the technique are very great. the writer whose whole training has lain in the play is content t [...]

      Reply

    21. Burning Bright is a "play in story form." A short novella in three acts revolving around a marriage: Joe Saul and Mordeen. Joe Saul is an older man, and Mordeen is his devoted wife. She'd do anything to please him. What Joe Saul wants more than anything is a child, a son. But what Mordeen knows--and Friend Ed knows as well--is that Joe Saul is sterile. What's a good wife to do? Enter Victor. A man who is mad over Mordeen. At first, the reader doesn't know what kind of madness this is it lust, is [...]

      Reply

    22. I´m a Steinbeck fan, but with this one I just had a bit trouble with the topic, I guess. At least at first, since in the end, it all turns around to a sensible stance on the issue. Maybe it needed to come a long way around in the times he wrote it, needed murder and betrayal and self-sacrifice? Idk. Anyway: It´s all quite dramatic, and for almost the whole stretch of the story about how much blood matters, in what you leave behind, in matters of your daily life and work. To have children of yo [...]

      Reply

    23. Burning Bright is a lesser known short piece that Steinbeck calls a play written in fiction form. There are three parts to this story: the circus, the farm, and the sea. The chapters are broken down into acts, and although the setting of the story changes the characters stay the same. This is Steinbeck in his purest form, writing again about the human condition in a way that cuts straight through pretense. In Act One, Joe Saul is an older circus performer married to a beautiful young woman named [...]

      Reply

    24. Part of Steinbeck's attempts at putting theater into his play-novella form along with Of Mice and Men and The Moon Is Down, Burning Bright struggles in the novella form. Yet, when I shifted to thinking about the play dramatically, I could see with the right actors and the right direction, the repetition, the different settings, and the slightly altered characters could have explored issues of infidelity, love, friendship, and legacy in a powerful night at the theater. Steinbeck is probably a vic [...]

      Reply

    25. Cup of Gold Steinbeck disavowed, but this he appreciated? While there are definite strengths--the allusion to the Biblical story of Saul, the unusual structure, the compelling set-up, and moments of great dialogue and description--there are also big drawbacks. The novel/play (whatever) builds too quickly, lending the first third an unintended melodramatic quality; the sea section is a great change, but under-utilized--it might have as well taken place on land; and the climax in which Joe Saul re [...]

      Reply

    26. Burning Bright is a play written as a short novel. There are four characters: Joe Saul (a widower in his 50s), Mordeen (his much younger second wife), Friend Ed (Joe and Mordeen's friend), and Victor (a younger man who works with Joe). Joe Saul badly wants a child, and Mordeen, having deduced that Joe is sterile, has a brief affair with Victor and plans to pass off the child as Joe's despite Victor's insistence that he will reveal that both she and the child are his. The story is told in three a [...]

      Reply

    27. This was a weird one. I like the idea of a lineage of knowledge and values, but I think the central theme (love and guidance are the responsibility of all men toward all children and the idea of a "bloodline" being all-important is narrow and contemptible) just seems too self-evident to me. I'm sure it was a revolutionary idea for Steinbeck at the time but I'm not a man in the 1950s so for me it doesn't seem like a story I particularly needed to hear. The changing of the setting between acts mus [...]

      Reply

    28. Steinbeck has the right idea with his play-novel. I don't have the patience to read something in play format. This was much more enjoyable and basically reads like a novel, with a bit more repition of the names than a regular novel would have, and a structure that jumped around from act to act as a play often does. The story line got pretty heartbreaking toward the end. You could point out examples of tragic irony and the like if you were so inclined, but I preferred to read it as a novel and ap [...]

      Reply

    29. As novella-plays go, this is perfect. The format is the perfect vehicle for Steinbeck's economy with words, and the character's voices rang in my ears whilst I read. What it'd be like to watch as a play is incredibly easy to imagine, so much so that I feel like I saw this as much as that I read it. For that method and its effectiveness, all the praise and appreciation. The characters respective issues, not something I initially felt interest for, gathered pace and emotion with each speech, and t [...]

      Reply

    30. The concept of this novel (based on an unsuccessful Broadway play Steinbeck wrote) is terrific; it's the kind of play I'd write. I especially like the changing of setting, biographies of characters, etc. between acts. But there are two problems: the language is ridiculously flowery. Maybe Steinbeck deliberately chose to do this; the play is not realistic in almost any other way. But it still doesn't work: it distances the reader/audience from the characters and their emotions. The second problem [...]

      Reply

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *