Фарс или никога вече самота

  • Title: Фарс или никога вече самота
  • Author: Kurt Vonnegut Кърт Вонегът Божидар Стойков
  • ISBN: null
  • Page: 387
  • Format: Paperback
  • Slapstick presents an apocalyptic vision as seen through the eyes of the current King of Manhattan and last President of the United States a wickedly irreverent look at the all too possible results
    Slapstick presents an apocalyptic vision as seen through the eyes of the current King of Manhattan and last President of the United States , a wickedly irreverent look at the all too possible results of today s follies But even the end of life as we know it is transformed by Kurt Vonnegut s pen into hilarious farce a final slapstick that may be the Almighty s joke on usSlapstick presents an apocalyptic vision as seen through the eyes of the current King of Manhattan and last President of the United States , a wickedly irreverent look at the all too possible results of today s follies But even the end of life as we know it is transformed by Kurt Vonnegut s pen into hilarious farce a final slapstick that may be the Almighty s joke on us all.

    • Unlimited [Classics Book] ☆ Фарс или никога вече самота - by Kurt Vonnegut Кърт Вонегът Божидар Стойков ↠
      387 Kurt Vonnegut Кърт Вонегът Божидар Стойков
    • thumbnail Title: Unlimited [Classics Book] ☆ Фарс или никога вече самота - by Kurt Vonnegut Кърт Вонегът Божидар Стойков ↠
      Posted by:Kurt Vonnegut Кърт Вонегът Божидар Стойков
      Published :2019-08-07T19:16:19+00:00

    About Kurt Vonnegut Кърт Вонегът Божидар Стойков


    1. Kurt Vonnegut, Junior was an American novelist, satirist, and most recently, graphic artist He was recognized as New York State Author for 2001 2003 He was born in Indianapolis, later the setting for many of his novels He attended Cornell University from 1941 to 1943, where he wrote a column for the student newspaper, the Cornell Daily Sun Vonnegut trained as a chemist and worked as a journalist before joining the U.S Army and serving in World War II After the war, he attended University of Chicago as a graduate student in anthropology and also worked as a police reporter at the City News Bureau of Chicago He left Chicago to work in Schenectady, New York in public relations for General Electric He attributed his unadorned writing style to his reporting work His experiences as an advance scout in the Battle of the Bulge, and in particular his witnessing of the bombing of Dresden, Germany whilst a prisoner of war, would inform much of his work This event would also form the core of his most famous work, Slaughterhouse Five, the book which would make him a millionaire This acerbic 200 page book is what most people mean when they describe a work as Vonnegutian in scope Vonnegut was a self proclaimed humanist and socialist influenced by the style of Indiana s own Eugene V Debs and a lifelong supporter of the American Civil Liberties Union.The novelist is known for works blending satire, black comedy and science fiction, such as Slaughterhouse Five 1969 , Cat s Cradle 1963 , and Breakfast of Champions 1973


    462 Comments


    1. “And how did wethen face the odds, of man's rude slapstick, yes, and God's?Quite at home and unafraid, Thank-you, in a gameour dreams remade.” ― Kurt Vonnegut, Slapstick, or Lonesome No More! My 15-ear-old son broke the screen on his iPhone 6s. I'm letting him buy down the debt (to me) by reading 6 Vonnegut novels before the end of the year. Every book he reads, drops his big OWE down by $10, upto $60. He is still on the hook for the other $80. This is what happens when daddy is an absurdi [...]

      Reply

    2. Vonnegut's most farcical, most absurd, but also one of the more scathing satires. Here Vonnegut takes on universalism, and totalitarianism, but on a grander scale than he allowed in Harrison Bergeron; but also this is more surreal. His genius, though, as seen in other novels, is to creatively intersperse pockets of stark realism to accentuate and to highlight the circus like theme. Vonnegut also uses elements of grotesque to further illustrate his none too subtle rebuke of egalitarianism. This i [...]

      Reply

    3. At this point I've gotten fairly familiar with Kurt Vonnegut's tone and flavor. The sense of universalism and equality consistently sound as often as his humor and irony rings.This books reads as a perversion of all four themes. To me.Usually Vonnegut's works seem to read with some underlying sense that no matter how bizarre everything seems, no matter how depressing or how inspiring a situation seems, there's always a punchline, and that punchline brings you back to reality, forcing the reader [...]

      Reply

    4. And with that, I learned once again that I was an asshole. I read 'Cat's Cradle' when I was in high school and taking a lot of ecstasy, so I hated everything except the Chemical Brothers. Since I hated Cat's Cradle then, I've assumed that I didn't like Mr Vonnegut for the last, what, dozen years? I only picked this one up 'cause I never see old editions of it and Josh said it's his favorite. That all sucks. I mean, I don't think he's perfect- I'd remembered his kind of smug, eccentric uncle pers [...]

      Reply

    5. Hmmm deformed, incestuous fraternal twins become geniuses when they touch their heads together. One is the last President of the United States of America. Ridiculous, yes? No. This is Vonnegut! I liked this one. I like all Vonnegut actually. I'm very biased, don't listen to me. Hi ho.

      Reply

    6. 2ND READ-THROUGH: I enjoyed this immensely, probably even more than the first time I read it (probably back in 2002). It’s a little more plot-driven than most of Vonnegut’s works, but it still explores the same basic concepts you’ll find in most of his oeuvre - in fact - diving deeper and more direct into one concept in particular that doesn’t *quite* find its way all of his novels: love. Specifically, familial love, and the meaning and purpose of family. Utilizing copious dystopian imag [...]

      Reply

    7. Note that I am giving this book a low rating as compared to Vonnegut's other books, and is not necessarily reflective of my opinion of it as a fine work of fiction.Really, when compared to the similarly-themed Cat's Cradle and The Sirens of Titan, this one just doesn't hold up as well. It boasts a classic Vonnegatian comedic end-of-the-world scenario, but Slapstick just doesn't quite live up to the standard set by his previous novels, and achieved again by later ones. I guess I can't really offe [...]

      Reply

    8. Another example of what makes Vonnegut so great. "Slapstick" combines sarcasm, humor, an absurd plot, and a critique of society and every part of it works. This is no where near his best book and yet it's still leaps and bounds over most other books.

      Reply

    9. Any other Sunflower-13's out there?

      Reply

    10. Un libro flojo a lo que es la obra de Vonnegut. Sus ideas humanitarias siempre claras, pero es el humor el que falla, encima abordado con insistencia fútil resultando en un libro aburrido y pesado. Se pasa de absurdo.

      Reply

    11. Ըստ Կուռտի, այս գիրքը մասամբ ինքնակենսագրական է, իր ու քույրիկի հարաբերությունների մասին։ Այդքան էլ չհավանեցի, մանավանդ վերջը լրիվ աջաբ սանդալ էր սարքել։ Բայց մի քանի պահ կար որ շատ եմ հավանել, ավելի կոնկրետ մենակության դեմ պայքարի միջոցը որ հաջողությամբ գրքի հերոսին բերե [...]

      Reply

    12. This was the very first Vonnegut book I’ve read, and while Slaughterhouse 5 is probably the most popular starter (as far as I’ve heard) I picked this volume at complete random because Barnes & Noble didn’t have Sirens of Titan which is what I originally wanted. In any event, I think this was quite a stroke of luck: Slapstick, or Lonesome No More! is a semi-autobiographical work, and for someone like me, who prefers to begin everything with first principles, I think this makes for an es [...]

      Reply

    13. "I wish that people who are conventionally supposed to love each other would say to each other, when they fight, “Please—a little less love, and a little more common decency." (3)Vonnegut famously, while self-assessing his work, gave Slapstick a D. Writers are notoriously poor at evaluating their own work, however, and Vonnegut's assessment of Slapstick is no exception. The Prologue is one of his most personal pieces of writing, as is the work itself – revolving, as it does, around the dea [...]

      Reply

    14. This is definitely a farcical style Vonnegut novel that takes the reader into a satirical and dark world that Vonnegut fans love. The time is far into the future when the government of the United States barely exists and the protagonist of the novel, the president of the United States, explains how things got this way. The book was written 40 years ago, and its is amazing how Kurt made predictions that have come into being. There are also many comical observations about politics that still hold [...]

      Reply

    15. The problem I have with most Vonnegut books is that they feel like they've been churned out of a random plot generator machine. I imagine Vonnegut throwing a bunch of scraps in a hat and then challenging himself to string the items together into some sort of book which will then fly off the shelves because he's VONNEGUT, for chrissakes. Sometimes the ideas hang together in interesting and fun ways. Other times they just flop around uselessly, sort of cute but really kind of gross, like a beagle [...]

      Reply

    16. Actual rating: 4.5*This shall be one of my shortest reviews, because all that needs to be said of this book, can be derived from the next six words*AbsurdProfoundEndlessly comicalHi Ho

      Reply

    17. 4,5/5*. Αστείο, σαρκαστικό, γλυκόπικρο, φανταστικό. Αυτά :-)

      Reply

    18. I was prompted to re-read this Vonnegut novel by a non-fiction work that I read recently. The Juggler’s Children was about the use of genetic research in relation to genealogical research and about the search of the modern North American to make some connections with people around them. People are lonely and looking for distant relatives assuages the loneliness somewhat.I was put in mind of this novel and its alternate title, Lonesome No More! I’m not sure why that slogan and the new middle- [...]

      Reply

    19. One of the things that I've always loved about Vonnegut is how simply he expresses complex ideas. Slapstick is no different. Here, he expands on the ideas of artificial families first imagined in his concepts of karass and duprass the Swain children may be duprass personified, with their collective brilliance and their intimacy far beyond what is appropriate for siblings. Their isolation, however, is what leads Wilbur to create what could be the anti-karass families built at random, not brought [...]

      Reply

    20. Slapstick, or Lonesome No More, is a self indulgent book by Kurt Vonnegut in his later years. He writes the book as if he's speaking to you, as a friend, in conversation. This style is great for the many Vonnegut fans, it conveys immediacy, friendliness and humour. For people who aren't fans of Vonneguts I wonder what they would make of his addressing his readers so intimately. He drops many of the contraints and conventions in story telling, but picks up other ways to carry the story. If aspiri [...]

      Reply

    21. This one was one of Vonnegut's best. He was creating worlds here, folks. Most specifically, a world---ours.The narrator happens to be the President of the United States---the LAST one, as a matter of fact.Wilbur Daffodil-11 Swain and his sister, Eliza, have got to be two of the most sympathetic characters KV ever created. Their voices just envelope you and draw you in. Some of Vonnegut's most ingenious devices & characters are in here---Green Death, the Hooligan (a thingie to communicate wit [...]

      Reply

    22. Vonnegut is always a bit strange, isn't he? I picked this book up at a hostel swap library and I read it in an afternoon. It has a bit of the sci-fi quality that he apparently says he doesn't write anymore, but nevertheless, it's there. The book was written in the late 70s, but some of the cultural predictions are, if not accurate, hilarious to read today. For example, the Chinese genetically develop themselves to be even tinier so that they consume less food. They get down to 6cm in size! Also, [...]

      Reply

    23. I was amazed with Vonnegut's tour through an apocalyptic world; his mixture of Gothic, science-fiction and comedy. That said, I stepped toward this reading tentatively, with visions of the horrible Jerry Lewis movie from the 1980s in my head. It was a rental: "Hey! This movie's got Jerry Lewis!" - a man whose cinematic ouevre is unparalleled if you give it a chance, you're 10 and the videocassette market is pretty slim pickings (it was, in the 80s).So I feared this: youtube/watch?v=GS9IJfBut wha [...]

      Reply

    24. "Why don't you take a flying fuck at a rolling doughnut? Why don't you take a flying fuck at the mooooooooooooon?" I don't really know what to say about this book. It's totally absurd. Also smart, witty, and completely entertaining. Not my favorite KV, but a worthy read.

      Reply

    25. My first Vonnegut book. For many years I felt like I should read something by KV as I have always heard great things about him and his writing. Ben suggested I start with this book, so I did. Slapstick was pitched as "hilarious", but I found it to be profoundly sad. It took me back to Christmas morning in Singapore when I had a conversation with an aunt of two of our friends. She was Singaporean of Chinese ancestry but lived in San Diego, and was back visiting for the holidays. She said that she [...]

      Reply

    26. STRANGEST OF THE STRANGEThis is the first book by Vonnegut that I have read . And honestly it was odd. (But in a good way). One can be odd ,different even eccentric without stereotyping them as weirdBack to the book . I felt his book was both happy even humorous at times . As I read more I felt sadness , deep sorrow . Vonnegut highly imaginative and intelligent book. And I found it written in the most uncomplicated , simple manner . It read much like having a conversation with a very creative pe [...]

      Reply

    27. A comical absurdism. This is the story of the President of the United States in not-so-far away future with a dumb wit and incestuous love with his abdominal sister and the cure for loneliness, on the other hand, it allegories American people and their "abdominal"land trying to bond with the primitive and ruthless origins whereas sometimes their ideology is justified to be perished and the U.S. after all can't be reconciled with his sister again (for the moment I write this on-- it reminds me of [...]

      Reply

    28. It's like staring at a Kandinsky (the later ones) and wondering why it makes absolute sense and kinda mind blowing although it all seems to be splotches of colors and random geometric patterns on a canvas. I kept tripping between smugness and earnestness when it comes to Vonnegut's brand of realism.

      Reply

    29. If I could give no stars, I would. I hated every sentence of this book.

      Reply

    30. Vonnegut at his best. I thoroughly enjoyed reading this one. At once apocalyptic and whimsical, this book juxtaposed the complete collapse of civilization and a decimated human population with a lovable and lighthearted hideous neanderthal of a main character whose demeanor is endearingly naive and accepting of the extreme circumstances by which he is surrounded. This character, which the prologue clearly establishes as Vonnegut's own image of himself, truly embodies the essence of why I love Ku [...]

      Reply

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *